Maple Finance
Protocol Security — Category Scores
Smart Contract Security
Completed Audits
3+ audits
Auditor Reputation
Top-tier (e.g. QuillAudits)
Critical Vulnerabilities Found
All resolved
Upgradeability Risk
Timelocked upgrades
Admin Privilege Controls
Timelocked multisig
Test Coverage
Above 80%
Formal Verification
None
Fuzzing
Advanced fuzzing (Echidna/Foundry)
ERC Standard Compliance
Fully compliant
Audit Recurrence
Ad-hoc
Spell Review / Governance Review
Internal security review
Oracle & Data Integrity
Oracle Decentralization
2 providers
Price Deviation Protection
Basic threshold checks
Fallback Oracle System
Manual fallback
Manipulation Resistance
Moderate safeguards
Custody & Asset Backing
Custody Provider
Third-party (non-regulated)
Proof of Reserves
Third-party attested
Redemption Guarantee
Contractual guarantee
Insurance Coverage
Partial / limited coverage
Redemption & Liquidity Safety
Redemption Mechanism
Structured with queue
Liquidity Buffer
5 - 15%
Governance Risk
Emergency Shutdown Controls
Multisig pause + timelock
Timelock Delay
24 - 48 hours
Compliance & Transfer Restrictions
KYC Gating
Required KYC for all
Whitelist Enforcement
On-chain enforced
Jurisdiction Restrictions
On-chain jurisdiction checks
Operational Security
Bug Bounty Program
Active on Immunefi / Cantina / HackenProof / HackerOne
Incident Response Plan
Documented plan
Monitoring Systems
Real-time monitoring
Third-Party Dependency Risk
All dependencies audited
Operational Audit (SOC 2 / ISO 27001)
In progress
Learn More
MAPLE FINANCE SECURITY FAQ
Maple Finance has an RWA Protocol Security Score of 67/100 with a grade of B. This protocol-level score is evaluated across 8 risk categories: smart contract security, oracle integrity, custody, redemption safety, governance, compliance, operational security, and transparency.
Maple Finance's protocol security score of 67 is a weighted average across 8 protocol risk categories: • Smart Contract Security (20%) • Oracle & Data Integrity (15%) • Custody & Asset Backing (15%) • Redemption & Liquidity Safety (10%) • Governance Risk (10%) • Compliance & Transfer Restrictions (10%) • Operational Security (10%) • Transparency & Proof Systems (10%) Each protocol category is scored 0–100 and multiplied by its weight to produce the overall score.
A protocol security grade of B means Maple Finance has a good security posture with room for improvement in some areas. The protocol has solid fundamentals but could strengthen certain risk categories to achieve a higher RWA Protocol Security Score.
The RWA Protocol Security Score of 67 (B) indicates Maple Finance's security posture relative to other RWA protocols on the leaderboard. This protocol security score should be one factor in your due diligence — also review the detailed category breakdown, consider regulatory compliance in your jurisdiction, and consult security professionals for high-value decisions. A higher protocol security score reflects stronger controls but does not constitute a guarantee of security.
Each RWA protocol is assessed across 8 risk categories: 1. Smart Contract Security — Protocol audit history, vulnerability resolution, upgradeability, admin privileges, test coverage. 2. Oracle & Data Integrity — Oracle decentralization, price manipulation protections, protocol fallback mechanisms. 3. Custody & Asset Backing — Protocol custody provider quality, multisig controls, proof of reserves, insurance coverage. 4. Redemption & Liquidity Safety — Protocol redemption mechanisms, liquidity buffers, bank-run protections. 5. Governance Risk — Protocol admin key management, token distribution, emergency controls, timelock delays. 6. Compliance & Transfer Restrictions — Protocol KYC gating, whitelist enforcement, jurisdiction restrictions. 7. Operational Security — Protocol bug bounty programs, incident response, monitoring, operational audits. 8. Transparency & Proof Systems — Protocol public financial disclosures, audit reports, on-chain asset verification.
