See how tokenized real-world asset protocols rank on security. Compare scores across 8 critical risk categories — smart contracts, oracle integrity, custody, governance, and more.
15 protocols ranked
| Rank | Protocol | Chain | Score | Grade | Category Breakdown | Submitted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Ethereum | 97/ 100 | A+ | 4d ago | ||
2 | Ethereum | 90/ 100 | A+ | 4d ago | ||
3 | Ethereum | 87/ 100 | A | 4d ago | ||
4 | Ethereum | 83/ 100 | A | 4d ago | ||
5 | Polygon | 75/ 100 | B+ | 4d ago | ||
6 | Ethereum | 74/ 100 | B+ | 4d ago | ||
7 | Ethereum | 72/ 100 | B+ | 4d ago | ||
8 | Ethereum | 68/ 100 | B | 4d ago | ||
9 | Ethereum | 67/ 100 | B | 4d ago | ||
10 | Ethereum | 64/ 100 | B | 4d ago | ||
11 | Ethereum | 62/ 100 | B | 4d ago | ||
12 | Ethereum | 59/ 100 | C+ | 4d ago | ||
13 | Ethereum | 46/ 100 | C | 4d ago | ||
14 | Ethereum | 45/ 100 | C | 4d ago | ||
15 | Solana | 41/ 100 | C | 4d ago |
Learn More
The RWA Protocol Security Leaderboard is the definitive public ranking of tokenized real-world asset protocols by security score. Each protocol is assessed across 8 risk categories — smart contract security, oracle integrity, custody, redemption safety, governance, compliance, operational security, and transparency — and given an overall protocol security score from 0 to 100 with a letter grade from A+ to F.
RWA protocols are ranked by their overall Protocol Security Score (0–100) from highest to lowest, calculated as a weighted average across 8 risk categories: • Smart Contract Security (20%) • Oracle & Data Integrity (15%) • Custody & Asset Backing (15%) • Redemption & Liquidity Safety (10%) • Governance Risk (10%) • Compliance & Transfer Restrictions (10%) • Operational Security (10%) • Transparency & Proof Systems (10%)
The leaderboard includes tokenized real-world asset protocols across categories: • Tokenized US Treasury protocols (Ondo, Franklin Templeton, Superstate) • Private Credit protocols (Maple Finance, Goldfinch, TrueFi) • Stablecoin-backed RWA protocols (Paxos) • Asset Tokenization Platforms (Securitize, Centrifuge, STOKR) • Tokenized Securities protocols (Backed Finance, xStocks, Spiko) New protocols are added as they submit and pass the RWA Protocol Security Score assessment.
The RWA Protocol Security Score is a weighted average across 8 risk categories evaluated for each tokenized real-world asset protocol: 1. Smart Contract Security (20%) 2. Oracle & Data Integrity (15%) 3. Custody & Asset Backing (15%) 4. Redemption & Liquidity Safety (10%) 5. Governance Risk (10%) 6. Compliance & Transfer Restrictions (10%) 7. Operational Security (10%) 8. Transparency & Proof Systems (10%) Each category contains multiple protocol-level factors scored 0–100. Overall score = Σ(category_score × category_weight).
Protocol security grades are assigned based on the overall RWA Protocol Security Score: • A+ (95–100): Exceptional protocol security across all categories • A (85–94): Excellent protocol security with minor areas for improvement • B+ (75–84): Good protocol security with some moderate risks • B (65–74): Acceptable security but several protocol-level areas need attention • C+ (55–64): Below average with notable protocol security concerns • C (45–54): Poor protocol security posture requiring significant improvements • D (35–44): Very weak protocol security with critical issues • F (0–34): Failing grade with severe protocol security deficiencies
To get your RWA protocol listed on the leaderboard: 1. Go to the RWA Protocol Security Score calculator page 2. Fill out the protocol self-assessment form accurately across all 8 risk categories 3. Submit your protocol for review 4. The QuillAudits team verifies and approves your protocol submission All protocol submissions are manually reviewed to ensure accuracy and scoring integrity.

From day-zero risk mapping to exchange-ready audits — QuillAudits helps projects grow with confidence. Smart contracts, dApps, infrastructure, compliance — secured end-to-end.