Franklin Templeton
Protocol Security — Category Scores
Smart Contract Security
Completed Audits
3+ audits
Auditor Reputation
Top-tier (e.g. QuillAudits)
Critical Vulnerabilities Found
All resolved
Upgradeability Risk
Admin-controlled
Admin Privilege Controls
Multisig owner
Test Coverage
Above 80%
Formal Verification
None
Fuzzing
Basic fuzzing
ERC Standard Compliance
Fully compliant
Audit Recurrence
Annually
Spell Review / Governance Review
Internal security review
Oracle & Data Integrity
Oracle Decentralization
2 providers
Price Deviation Protection
Basic threshold checks
Fallback Oracle System
Manual fallback
Manipulation Resistance
Moderate safeguards
Custody & Asset Backing
Custody Provider
Top-tier regulated + insured
Proof of Reserves
Third-party attested
Redemption Guarantee
Regulatory backed
Insurance Coverage
Full asset value insured
Redemption & Liquidity Safety
Redemption Mechanism
Structured with queue
Liquidity Buffer
Above 15%
Governance Risk
Emergency Shutdown Controls
Multisig pause + timelock
Timelock Delay
24 - 48 hours
Compliance & Transfer Restrictions
KYC Gating
KYC + AML monitoring
Whitelist Enforcement
Compliant transfer agent
Jurisdiction Restrictions
Full regulatory compliance
Operational Security
Incident Response Plan
Documented plan
Monitoring Systems
Real-time monitoring
Third-Party Dependency Risk
All dependencies audited
Operational Audit (SOC 2 / ISO 27001)
SOC 2 Type II certified
Learn More
FRANKLIN TEMPLETON SECURITY FAQ
Franklin Templeton has an RWA Protocol Security Score of 75/100 with a grade of B+. This protocol-level score is evaluated across 8 risk categories: smart contract security, oracle integrity, custody, redemption safety, governance, compliance, operational security, and transparency.
Franklin Templeton's protocol security score of 75 is a weighted average across 8 protocol risk categories: • Smart Contract Security (20%) • Oracle & Data Integrity (15%) • Custody & Asset Backing (15%) • Redemption & Liquidity Safety (10%) • Governance Risk (10%) • Compliance & Transfer Restrictions (10%) • Operational Security (10%) • Transparency & Proof Systems (10%) Each protocol category is scored 0–100 and multiplied by its weight to produce the overall score.
A protocol security grade of B+ means Franklin Templeton has a good security posture with room for improvement in some areas. The protocol has solid fundamentals but could strengthen certain risk categories to achieve a higher RWA Protocol Security Score.
The RWA Protocol Security Score of 75 (B+) indicates Franklin Templeton's security posture relative to other RWA protocols on the leaderboard. This protocol security score should be one factor in your due diligence — also review the detailed category breakdown, consider regulatory compliance in your jurisdiction, and consult security professionals for high-value decisions. A higher protocol security score reflects stronger controls but does not constitute a guarantee of security.
Each RWA protocol is assessed across 8 risk categories: 1. Smart Contract Security — Protocol audit history, vulnerability resolution, upgradeability, admin privileges, test coverage. 2. Oracle & Data Integrity — Oracle decentralization, price manipulation protections, protocol fallback mechanisms. 3. Custody & Asset Backing — Protocol custody provider quality, multisig controls, proof of reserves, insurance coverage. 4. Redemption & Liquidity Safety — Protocol redemption mechanisms, liquidity buffers, bank-run protections. 5. Governance Risk — Protocol admin key management, token distribution, emergency controls, timelock delays. 6. Compliance & Transfer Restrictions — Protocol KYC gating, whitelist enforcement, jurisdiction restrictions. 7. Operational Security — Protocol bug bounty programs, incident response, monitoring, operational audits. 8. Transparency & Proof Systems — Protocol public financial disclosures, audit reports, on-chain asset verification.
